Category: Navigation

All about maps, compasses, and finding your way

GPS Accuracy of the Garmin Flagships

As a kid I fantasized about how great it would be to have a map on which you could see where you are, like the Marauders Map of Harry Potter. Who could have thought that a couple of years later there would be a technology that makes it possible, a technology so brilliant that it even takes into account Einsteins’ special theory of relativity.

Since my first GPS I am always looking for the most accurate GPS for logging my sports and hiking trips. I started in 2007 with the Garmin GPSMAP 60csx, but it was quite bulky for running (I had to keep it in hand). I therefore switched to the relatively unknown I-gotU devices. They were succeeded by the TomTom weareables (Adventurer) and they seemed pretty accurate (I still use them for open water swimming, attached to my buoy). Since they were discontinued I switched to Garmin. On my bike I have used the Edge 810, Edge 830 and am currently using the Edge 1040. For running and swimming the Fenix 7 and for hiking I recently bought the GPSMAP 67. The latter 3 are currently the top-of-the-bill consumer models from Garmin that use multiple satellite systems.

I’ve been using the Fenix 7 and Edge 1040 for quite some time now and they are giving good results and good agreement if I use them both (and I often do). I expected the GPSMAP67 to perform at least as good as them, if not better, since it has the same GPS chip, but a better antenna. So I took all three of them on a MTB trip through the forest. Auch! The result of the GPSMAP 67 was a bit disappointing: it’s track deviated from the Fenix 7 and Edge 1040 tracks. Though the Fenix and Edge are in good agreement with each other throughout the entire trip, the GPSMAP 67 showed deviations. And yes, two against one…

Red: Edge 1040, Blue: Fenix 7, Green: GPSMAP 67. Deviations from left to right (thin line): 12 m, 19 m, 11 m and 8 m.

Reason to put them on the test bench for a more thorough examination…

Disclaimer: yes, I am a GPS weirdo πŸ€ͺand I go to the last cm. If you think: ‘Man, what are you fuzzing about?‘, stop reading here.

Garmin GPSMAP 67 unacceptable drift

This is a report on the issue of the Garmin GPSMAP 67 in which we observe an huge drift of the location it indicates when satellite reception is not optimal. Next picture shows the coordinate as recorded by the device overnight when placed stationary at the window. At the start the location is indicated correctly (green symbol).

Images have been taken from the Garmin Connect website. An investigation has been made into the problem. This document reports on the findings.

Mercator projections, a comparison

Introduction

While writing the previous post on Rijksdriehoeksmeting and OziExplorer, we came upon two map projections: Oblique Stereographic and Transverse Mercator. In this post we will have a look at the Mercator and Transverse Mercator projections and try to compare. Both projections are quite frequently used. So let’s have a look at them.

Mercator projections are cylindrical projections. The earth, represented by a spheroid or ellipsoid, is projected on a cylindrical surface. In contrast to a sphere, a cylinder can be flattened out as a 2D surface, the map.

Spherical Mercator Projection

The page is supported by a Java code project MapDatumConvert on Github in which I have programmed the projections and Map Datum conversions between Rijksdriehoeksmeting and WGS84.

OziExplorer and Rijksdriehoeksmeting

Introduction

OziExplorer is my favorite tool for working with topographical maps. Even in this era of mobile apps with all kind of online maps, I am a bit old fashioned by having my own collection of maps and OziExplorer is a great way to use them.

I am a Dutchy and here in the Netherlands the β€˜authorities’ that are responsible for Dutch topographic maps use the Rijksdriehoeksmeting (RD) Map Datum.

Primary reference points of the Rijksdriehoeksmeting Stelsel

In this blog we look at the Dutch maps and describe how to get them properly working in OziExplorer.

Serving your own PDOK maps

I am fascinated by navigation and maps. When I visit a new location one of the first things I do is getting a topographical map of the region. Sometimes I use historical maps, like the Werbata map (dating from 1911, see also Wikipedia) for my trips to Curacao. Since 2007 I log my activities (like running, hiking, cycling, swimming, surveying) using GPS (TomTom watch) and I like to plot these on a map online. Since surroundings change, I like not only to have the most current maps, but also historical maps. As a Dutchy a found the Kabouterbond maps worthwhile. Since 2012 the PDOK Basisregistratie Topografie (BRT) maps which can be downloaded for free in raster or vector format. PDOK is a cooperation between het Kadaster and the Dutch government.

So I end up with a collection of digital maps which I like to use with OziExplorer (for route planning e.g.) and online on my own websites. This post describes the way I proceeded to serve my maps for online usage.

PDOK based vector map from my server, described in this post

OziExplorer maps from GeoTIFF

Introduction

I still find Oziexplorer an excellent and versatile program for navigation, despite of the many, many apps relying on on-line maps.

This page describes how to create Oziexplorer maps from GeoTIFF, including map merge. As an example we take the Basis Registratie Topografie (BRT) Top25raster 1:25.000 maps of the Netherlands that can be downloaded from PDOK and we will create an ozfx4 map covering the entire Netherlands.

The GeoTIFF format is an image tif format that contains geo information.